RE: Unconventional opinions
April 11, 2014 at 7:41 am
(This post was last modified: April 11, 2014 at 7:46 am by Ben Davis.)
(April 11, 2014 at 5:14 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: - Marriage is wrongNot just 'not for everyone' but fundamentally wrong as a concept: everyone should be free to express their commitment to their partner in whatever fashion they so choose without a legal requirement for permission or ratification from a public body (be that governmental or religious). Personally, I take it as a direct insult that my commitment to my partner is not considered sufficient, appropriate or trust-worthy unless ratified by the government or the state religion.
I think that depends on the marriage. But I agree to the extent that marriage isn't for everyone.
Quote: - Domestic government should be about administration and implementation: the decisions should be made by panels of the expertsIn the UK, the government comes up with the ideas and makes the decisions with no requirement of regard for facts: our politicians can do what they like for whatever reasons they can sell to their fellow politicians. I would stop that and put the idea-generation and decision-making power in the hands of bodies of experts. Those experts would be chosen by the public from lists of qualified candidates: qualifications would be education and experience.
I'm pretty sure the first clause is generally the case. As to the second, who chooses the experts?
Quote: - Raves should be legalSee my response to sejanus
Didn't know they weren't.
Quote: - All wages should be equalThe latter. All work of value is of equal value therefore should be equally & equitably remunerated.
Really? Which would you rather have: A tumor removed by a surgeon doing it for janitor's wages, or your garbage picked up by someone making surgeon's wages?
Quote: - There should be a cap on profitIt would go better with the pin-stripes
Disagree. I think profit would look better in a bowler hat than a cap.
Quote: - All essential services (e.g. food, water, housing, health, education, fuel and more...) should be publically owned and free to the userThat's why I said 'free to the user'. Think of the model of the UK National Health Service: it's paid for by taxes but when you use the service, you pay nothing.
And who pays for these things? If you fund them via taxes or service fees, they aren't 'free'.
Sum ergo sum