RE: Unconventional opinions
April 15, 2014 at 4:48 pm
(This post was last modified: April 15, 2014 at 4:49 pm by MJ the Skeptical.)
(April 15, 2014 at 4:41 pm)KUSA Wrote: Define proper as it relates to this.
As it relates to what? it's a pretty straight forward concept.
(April 15, 2014 at 4:41 pm)KUSA Wrote: How can it be unless you live by a river and have natural growing vegetation to sustain you?
Easy, you stop charging for it. But seriously, it's obviously not practical right now, so the fuck what? it's still an idea I'd like to see come true and most people in the U.S. anyway don't seem to be on board.
I mean, the internet is considered a right to life in Germany. And we can't figure out food and water being a right to life..
(April 15, 2014 at 4:41 pm)KUSA Wrote: What level is acceptable to you?
I don't know buddy, I'm not dictator of the world.
What's with the baiting? If we could get it down to zero that'd be great and with genetic modifying we will likely reduce the slaughter severely in the future. But again, wrong time period for me to be wishing for that, I admit that.
(April 15, 2014 at 4:41 pm)KUSA Wrote: Why?
Because you're a sentient animal with person-hood. Derp.
If the hypothetical idea of an afterlife means more to you than the objectively true reality we all share, then you deserve no respect.
