(April 17, 2014 at 5:14 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Classic fallacy. Because something is unique doesn't mean it's any less likely to exist.
If something doesn't exist, it isn't very unique. Indeed, there is nothing unique about your god claim. There are thousands of them and they all have the same total lack of evidential backing.
Quote:And you are shouldering the burden of proof claiming that there could be possible transferable evidence of the supernatural. That's pure illogic right there.
The supernatural is pure 'illogic'.
No, there can't be transferable evidence of the supernatural because the very concept of the supernatural is designed specifically to avoid any scrutiny. It's an unfalsifiable (read: absolutely of no value) hypothesis, and this is done on purpose, so that people like you, with no actual intellectual foundation to stand on, can pretend that you do when you say "you can't prove it isn't real therefore it is a valid statement with real meaning".
Actually, that's not exactly right. What you're really saying is "It is a valid statement with real meaning BECAUSE you can't prove it's not real". So, equally, are statements insisting upon the existence of unicorns and leprechauns.
