RE: Atheists... why do you believe that God doesn't exist?
April 19, 2014 at 8:04 am
(This post was last modified: April 19, 2014 at 8:05 am by fr0d0.)
1. I don't believe in something that lacks supporting evidence. I believe in something which cannot by definition have objective evidence.
2. I just answered.
3. Read the thread and your 1st response to me
4. I believe in a supernatural entity. I do not believe in superstitious nonsense. No conflict there. Your statement that I have a supernatural belief is nonsensical in itself... It asserts that I have supernatural ability.
5. I just explained why I don't believe in other supernatural entities giving the leprechaun as an example.
6. Intellect is a gift I assume you possess, just like me. With this we can explore any proposal presented. I don't dismiss the supernatural. You do. Your conclusion isn't mine. Your reasoning being.... there is no natural evidence. I'm sorry, that not logical. My reasoning: the theological evidence for God.
7. You studied a few religions superficially. I've done that and also studied one particular religion exhaustively and also as an active participant. You bet I claim authority.
8. You apparently can't read.
9. You claim to have studied comparative religions, yet you have no idea how to distinguish between deity and superficial magic. I find that hard to believe... that you claim ignorance of a subject you claim to have studied.
2. I just answered.
3. Read the thread and your 1st response to me
4. I believe in a supernatural entity. I do not believe in superstitious nonsense. No conflict there. Your statement that I have a supernatural belief is nonsensical in itself... It asserts that I have supernatural ability.
5. I just explained why I don't believe in other supernatural entities giving the leprechaun as an example.
6. Intellect is a gift I assume you possess, just like me. With this we can explore any proposal presented. I don't dismiss the supernatural. You do. Your conclusion isn't mine. Your reasoning being.... there is no natural evidence. I'm sorry, that not logical. My reasoning: the theological evidence for God.
7. You studied a few religions superficially. I've done that and also studied one particular religion exhaustively and also as an active participant. You bet I claim authority.
8. You apparently can't read.
9. You claim to have studied comparative religions, yet you have no idea how to distinguish between deity and superficial magic. I find that hard to believe... that you claim ignorance of a subject you claim to have studied.
