(April 27, 2014 at 3:42 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(April 27, 2014 at 3:30 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: You do the exact same this you moan about atheists doing: reject supernatural claims lacking evidence.
NO SUPERNATURAL ENTITY CAN POSSIBLY HAVE NATURAL EVIDENCE OF ITS EXISTENCE.
I have never made such an error.
This is simply false. A supernatural entity may leave natural evidence. It's being supernatural only means that some aspects of it cannot be explained naturally. A rock that supernaturally produces gold when you rub it would leave plenty of natural evidence in the form of gold. It sounds like you're making up your own definition of the word supernatural. Even God could leave behind natural evidence in the form of healed amputees. I think you're confused.