Theists argue for the existence of an intelligent creator of the universe, I can't speak for everyone but it seems the majority of Atheists are merely responding to that claim and counter-arguing for the apparent lack of evidence for any cosmic creator. It's a popular red herring to say we're contradicting them out of spitefulness, but in reality we're simply informing them of the unjustifiable claim after claim made by exposing the flaws or weaknesses in their argument - we're trying to explain to them they've failed on a basic level to understand what's required for an existence claim.
Eventually someday we can only hope for the sake of progress Theists will finally get a clue and realise its their privilege to believe whatever they want in their private time, but they have no right to push their unsubstantiated faith-based systems into our public lives and enforcing divisive religious beliefs onto government or state-owned institutions like the Court of law, business establishments, health care or our education systems. Evidence-free concepts such as god, angels and spirits have no place or belonging in children's science classes or within the workplace.
Eventually someday we can only hope for the sake of progress Theists will finally get a clue and realise its their privilege to believe whatever they want in their private time, but they have no right to push their unsubstantiated faith-based systems into our public lives and enforcing divisive religious beliefs onto government or state-owned institutions like the Court of law, business establishments, health care or our education systems. Evidence-free concepts such as god, angels and spirits have no place or belonging in children's science classes or within the workplace.
