Judge rules it was OK for widow to lose home over $6.30 in unpaid interest
April 28, 2014 at 8:54 pm
(This post was last modified: April 28, 2014 at 8:56 pm by Autumnlicious.)
Inhumanity over the most trite of debts.
REF: http://www.philly.com/philly/news/201404...9be5a.html
If noncompliance was such a problem (which I doubt – there was no mention of refusing to pay), why not simply throw the defendant in jail for a few days to compel payment?
Rotten judge, rotten county.
REF: http://www.philly.com/philly/news/201404...9be5a.html
Quote:BEAVER, Pa. (AP) - A widow was given ample notice before her $280,000 house was sold at a tax auction three years ago over $6.30 in unpaid interest, a Pennsylvania judge has ruled.
The decision last week turned down Eileen Battisti's request to reverse the September 2011 sale of her home outside Aliquippa in western Pennsylvania.
"I paid everything, and didn't know about the $6.30," Battisti said. "For the house to be sold just because of $6.30 is crazy."
If noncompliance was such a problem (which I doubt – there was no mention of refusing to pay), why not simply throw the defendant in jail for a few days to compel payment?
Rotten judge, rotten county.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
