RE: Next They'll Be Wanting to Burn Them
April 28, 2014 at 9:31 pm
(This post was last modified: April 28, 2014 at 9:33 pm by Lek.)
(April 28, 2014 at 9:01 pm)NoraBrimstone Wrote:(April 28, 2014 at 7:31 pm)Lek Wrote: I know how sexually charged tenth graders are. That's even more good reason not to give them sexually charged literature.Why? Is there something wrong with sex?
No. Not under the proper circumstances.
(April 28, 2014 at 9:05 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(April 28, 2014 at 7:31 pm)Lek Wrote: I know how sexually charged tenth graders are. That's even more good reason not to give them sexually charged literature.
Is that seriously the extent of your argument? "They like it, therefore we should keep it from them?"
It's hilarious: do you actually live in a world where every kid in school isn't connected to the internet through at least one device that is perpetually with them?
Would you want the school to give them porn to read since they're going to read it anyway?
(April 28, 2014 at 9:09 pm)Chad32 Wrote: I'm not sure what people think censoring content will do. Teenagers don't have sex because they read something in a book or saw something on TV. They have sex because their bodies have reached the developmental stage where they can start procreating. They may not really be fit to do it, but leaving them ignorant of it all doesn't help.
We don't have to leave them ignorant.
