RE: Judge rules it was OK for widow to lose home over $6.30 in unpaid interest
April 29, 2014 at 1:39 am
(This post was last modified: April 29, 2014 at 1:45 am by Anomalocaris.)
The procedure doesn't have to be morally unimpeachable to be legally necessary to uphold. It only has to be not greatly more procedurally flawed than what is par for the course.
Otherwise no legal transaction can be entered with reasonable expectation of legal protection from ex post sentimentality. That would not, on a much larger scale than a minority of hard luck cases, serve the greater public good.
The judge does have wide latitude. Fortunately In this case he exercised dutifully to protect the role of legality against sentimentality.
Otherwise no legal transaction can be entered with reasonable expectation of legal protection from ex post sentimentality. That would not, on a much larger scale than a minority of hard luck cases, serve the greater public good.
The judge does have wide latitude. Fortunately In this case he exercised dutifully to protect the role of legality against sentimentality.
