Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote:(Yesterday 16:26)fr0d0 Wrote:
Straw man again.
I'm saying the opposite.
"We call what cannot be faulted knowledge. If you can't fault a premise, then you can build on that premise, as long as it stands unrefuted."
The alleged 'straw man' is simply a different way of describing that first sentence. You do consider "assertions which cannot be tested" valid knowledge. Someone else even bolded it above my post. That's why it caught my attention. It is a bold and proud declaration of cognitive failure.
And so it boils down to you not bothering to read.
Nice.
I expected no more.
I'm tired of you clowns.
Summon me when you think of something interesting to say.
