RE: Next They'll Be Wanting to Burn Them
May 1, 2014 at 9:34 am
(This post was last modified: May 1, 2014 at 9:36 am by Chas.)
(April 28, 2014 at 7:15 pm)Lek Wrote:(April 27, 2014 at 10:11 pm)Chad32 Wrote: They can't debunk the criticisms, and they're not allowed to kill heretics, so they just have to ban things that make them uncomfortable.
Sexually charged material already mocks christian values, so it's a two for one.
Do you want the public schools to have the students read books with sexually charged material?
I have no problem with that.
(April 28, 2014 at 9:31 pm)Lek Wrote:(April 28, 2014 at 9:01 pm)NoraBrimstone Wrote: Why? Is there something wrong with sex?
No. Not under the proper circumstances.
(April 28, 2014 at 9:05 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Is that seriously the extent of your argument? "They like it, therefore we should keep it from them?"
It's hilarious: do you actually live in a world where every kid in school isn't connected to the internet through at least one device that is perpetually with them?
Would you want the school to give them porn to read since they're going to read it anyway?
Porn would be an acceptable part of a sex education class.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
