(April 24, 2010 at 4:40 am)Saerules Wrote:i always have to delete your useless tigers. I guess you could say that my questions were somewhat of a metaphor on how we don't know what is perfect and how all of our understanding on matter that we shouldn't be so keen on believing in an afterlife that abandons matter. Someone said that if God made us with different tubes for the windpipe and esophagus etc. then their god would essentially be creating 'himself', perfect.(April 23, 2010 at 4:03 pm)The_Flying_Skeptic Wrote:(April 23, 2010 at 3:19 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: That would be him making himself
are you saying that God's windpipe and esophagus run different tubes? are you saying that God doesn't starve or take a shit? I can't believe people describe something so poorly understood, something that's only vaguely described, a god, as 'perfect'. How could you expect anything after death when all you know is our dependency on matter?
Why would 'God' have a windpipe or esophagus? Silly flying skeptic
Starving would necessitate a need for nutrients. Why would 'God' not be self sufficient?
Shitting assumes that there is waste within 'God'... why would there be waste in 'God'?
That we don't know what is "perfect" and thus argue against a 'God' being so is an argument from ignorance.
"shitting assumes that there is a waste within good"
i was just saying that as an atheist looking at creationists beliefs... we share the same disgusting characteristic as every other animal, we get rid of waste, yet they believe we are special. We all enjoy sex, yet we are expected to go to an afterlife where we don't have sex? - my stream of consciousness on an immaterial afterlife