What you're arguing defies everything we know about physic, geology, biology, (e.g., the locations of modern day species like the Koalas in Australia that could not have survived without their only native food source, nor the trek from Mt. Arrat to swim thousands of miles across the Indian Ocean), genetics, the amount of water currently on earth, on top of just not making any damn sense.
It doesn't need to be refuted. It's funny watching you do mental backflips trying to account for it, but the story itself just doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
You fully believe it, and will dismiss any amount of reasonable objection with "Because God," so what's the point in arguing anything with you?
It doesn't need to be refuted. It's funny watching you do mental backflips trying to account for it, but the story itself just doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
You fully believe it, and will dismiss any amount of reasonable objection with "Because God," so what's the point in arguing anything with you?
