(May 10, 2014 at 2:19 am)Heywood Wrote:(May 10, 2014 at 2:08 am)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote: So, it's okay for employers to be too cheap to pay for the labor they get, and they have the right to pass on the moral and social obligations everybody else apparently has.
What is your car worth? Well it is worth what people will pay for it. Why does every other exchange follow that rule except labor? Why the inconsistency?
My view is consistent, cause I think every exchange should follow that rule....including labor.
And if you can't afford to sustain your life, you don't deserve to be alive?