Abiogenesis is impossible

[Rampant.A.I.]

There is nothing to refute. Unlike creationists, real scientists are willing to put their theories to the test. Incomplete or sloppy work is therefore exposed and results can be discarded or must be supported via other data and research, which itself can be tested. In doing so, we learn more and get closer to the truth.

You did notice that scientists did not use this one paper to dismiss evolution at all, didn't you? Or perhaps you did, which is why your summary is so misleading and your conclusion so wrong. I realize that at this point you've given up and are just flinging poo at the wall, but a person might expect you to actually read the material you are partially quoting and perhaps learn something, if even by accident.

evolutionist atheist are not the only ones going to be referenced on this board, so get used to it.

---

What we need is a video of someone singing the words "argument from ignorance!" in a loud, lengthy, operatic voice, so that we can all post it whenever smug morons like Snowy think shit like this is an argument.

You know what refutes your single, out of date paper, shitbird? The last fifteen years of evolution accepting biological science. Fucking checkmate.

the hominid fossil record demonstrate that a reliable diagram cannot be built showing that bipedal primates (human erectus and neanderthals) are transitional forms to humans. so what's with this theory? did it go like this? look, there's a upright animal, we're upright, so we evolved from them.