Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 13, 2024, 10:42 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Does it make sense to speak of "Universal Consciousness" or "Universal Intelligence"?
RE: Does it make sense to speak of "Universal Consciousness" or "Univer...
(May 27, 2014 at 12:16 am)bennyboy Wrote:
(May 26, 2014 at 10:53 pm)Chas Wrote: You keep saying that qualia are beyond the reach of science, but that is an unsupported assertion. You don't know that to be true.
No I don't. But there's nothing right now that makes it seem that science, a tool of physical inquiry, can directly study qualia, which cannot currently be interacted with on any level but direct experience.

Quote:It seems to be beyond our current science, but a clever experimenter might figure out how to test it tomorrow or future technologies might make it straightforward.
It could be that a clever experiementer will discover that even QM particles don't exist at all except as ideas. But there's no reason right now to believe that scientists are able to interact with anything other than physical correlates of mind-- and so long as that stays the same, there are serious philosophical issues with the science of mind.

Quote:And I don't know what you mean by 'philosophically sufficient'.
Philosophy doesn't give us answers, it helps us ask questions and clarify our thinking.
By philosophically sufficient, I mean that the word "mind" represents what I use it for-- my experience of qualia. I've seen plenty of people argue that mind and brain function are necessarily identical, and that brain-monitoring devices are in fact monitoring mind.

This definition is useful if you want a medical test to use on coma patients. It's not philsophically sufficient as a measure of the actual existence of qualia. Hooking a piece of space fungus up to a brain-wave machine and pronouncing a lack of qualia, for example, would be a poor process.

Well, I have not once said brain and mind are the same.

But I see no philosophical difficulty as I am able to leave the question open and accept that we either will or will not find an answer.

But not finding an answer after a finite time - no matter how long - does not mean we will never find an answer.

Philosophy does not give us answers, it only helps us ask better questions.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Does it make sense to speak of "Universal Consciousness" or "Univer... - by Chas - May 27, 2014 at 1:44 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Good read on consciousness Apollo 41 2691 January 12, 2021 at 4:04 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Machine Intelligence and Human Ethics BrianSoddingBoru4 24 2063 May 28, 2019 at 1:23 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  are aesthetics universal? zainab 15 1306 March 2, 2019 at 7:24 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  How could we trust our consciousness ?! zainab 45 5043 December 30, 2018 at 9:08 am
Last Post: polymath257
  dynamic morality vs static morality or universal morality Mystic 18 3663 May 3, 2018 at 10:28 am
Last Post: LastPoet
  The Universal Moral Code BlindedWantsToSee 57 7679 November 2, 2017 at 6:29 pm
Last Post: BlindedWantsToSee
  Consciousness Trilemma Neo-Scholastic 208 57390 June 7, 2017 at 5:28 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Trying to simplify my Consciousness hypothesis Won2blv 83 14760 February 21, 2017 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  My thoughts on the Hard problem of consciousness Won2blv 36 5780 February 15, 2017 at 7:27 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  A hypothesis about consciousness Won2blv 12 4060 February 12, 2017 at 9:31 pm
Last Post: Won2blv



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)