For the Thinking Man.

[Artur Axmann]

---

All Im saying is for you to explain rational thought in purely materialistic terms .

If you can't ,then that opens the possibility that there exists a reality beyond the physical.

you're overthinking this and getting too worked up over it.

Why, because you can't understand it?

You're attempting -- and failing miserably -- to equivocate between thoughts, for which there is substantial empirical evidence, with a deity for which by definition no empirical evidence is possible, and then pointing to that purported entity as the reason rational thought is possible.

You're skipping a metric tonne of steps along the way.

This is your argument:

p1 I can't figure out how rational thought is possible.
p2 I assume you also can't figure out how rational thought is possible.
p3 I need to know right now how rational thought is possible, so I'm going to fabricate an explanation.

c1 The Lucky Charms leprechaun makes marshmallows magically delicious; and also makes rational thought possible.

---

I'm not fabricating, but you are..
read again: Explain human consciousness and rational thinking in purely
naturalistic terms . if you can't ,then just say so.