RE: Evidence God Exists
April 30, 2010 at 6:30 am
(This post was last modified: April 30, 2010 at 9:59 am by Ace Otana.)
(April 30, 2010 at 5:55 am)Loki_999 Wrote: Gotta call bull then on your statement because you presented it as fact. There is reason to believe there may have been life on either Venus or Mars, but no hard evidence.
*Big wooper of a snip*
It's not fact but it's the next best thing. Also, the statements comes from the discovery channel which received this data from NASA and it's scientists and the very expensive probe they have sent to investigate the planet. Geological marks that point to a once flowing river on mars. Which means the planet had an atmospher. Big enough evidence to convince me that mars could at one point support life and did. It's not a scientific fact but a working scientific theory. Good enough.

Quote:have been life on either Venus or Mars, but no hard evidence.True, there is no hard evidence. However, based on what has been found (like dry land that looks like it was shapped by water long ago), it has been concluded that it's very possible that life had existed on both planets. Scientific theories are fucking awsome! So much infomation missing, and the lust to find that missing infomation with the evidence to support it.
Tell me what do you see in this picture of mars surface?
![[Image: mars-networksm.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.astronomynotes.com%2Fsolarsys%2Fpics%2Fmars-networksm.jpg)
A river was there.

Quote:Got to be careful you know about making firm statements.... their are theists on these boards who will ridicule us if we start making unfounded claims.Firstly, I don't make things up. This was presented on the discovery channel. Also, unlike a typical theist, If I was proven wrong about something, I would be more than happy to admit to being wrong about it.
The claims that life may have started on mars or venus is backed up by evidence of water and this concludes that there was an atmosphere based on geological markings on the surface. Not exactly an "unfounded claim".
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.