RE: Does it make sense to speak of "Universal Consciousness" or "Univer...
May 31, 2014 at 8:08 am
(This post was last modified: May 31, 2014 at 8:25 am by Chas.)
(May 29, 2014 at 5:25 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote:(May 28, 2014 at 9:23 pm)bennyboy Wrote: I don't think I ever said I'm a dualist.
Sorry, I must have confused a comment by ChadWooters with yourself. YOU said you're an agnostic idealist, yes? Just out of curiosity, why idealism rather than realism, in your view?
I don't think I ever said that, either.
(May 29, 2014 at 6:12 pm)bennyboy Wrote:(May 29, 2014 at 2:25 pm)Chas Wrote: Believe you? I don't even understand what you are asking.We are in a thread about mind, and you've stated many times that the evidence favors a particular view of mind. I've stated many time that since the mind of others cannot be directly observed, evidence about it is rooted in one or more philosophical assumptions for which there cannot be meaningful evidence.
I want you to specify what evidence you actually have, and in what way you are confident that it supports your positions, rather than simply repeatedly saying you have evidence. You say there is neurological evidence that supports monism. Please provide it.
Our actual experience with brain differences and brain damage show effects on the mind are brain-based. The results from neuroscience at all levels support being a consequence of the brain. There is no evidence for any other hypothesis.
Hypotheses that don't take that into account are unscientific.
There is a massive amount of data and you can Google for it as easily as I.
Bear, M. F.; B. W. Connors, and M. A. Paradiso (2006). Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott. ISBN 0-7817-6003-8.
Binder, Hirokawa, Windhorst, ed. (2009). Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-23735-8.
Kandel, ER; Schwartz JH, Jessell TM (2000). Principles of Neural Science (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-8385-7701-6.
Squire, L. et al. (2003). Fundamental Neuroscience, 2nd edition. Academic Press; ISBN 0-12-660303-0
Byrne and Roberts (2004). From Molecules to Networks. Academic Press; ISBN 0-12-148660-5
Sanes, Reh, Harris (2005). Development of the Nervous System, 2nd edition. Academic Press; ISBN 0-12-618621-9
Siegel et al. (2005). Basic Neurochemistry, 7th edition. Academic Press; ISBN 0-12-088397-X
Rieke, F. et al. (1999). Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code. The MIT Press; Reprint edition ISBN 0-262-68108-0
etc.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.