An unorthodox belief in God.
June 6, 2014 at 2:42 pm
(This post was last modified: June 6, 2014 at 2:45 pm by Rampant.A.I..)
(June 6, 2014 at 1:28 pm)mickiel Wrote:(June 6, 2014 at 1:08 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: And which scriptures would those be, Mickiel?
You see, you are making a lot of bald assertions here. When you make a claim, how about providing some supporting evidence for that claim? That's sort of the way rational discussions work. Any time you say things like "That's one more for god" without backing anything up, you are simply making yourself to be a fool.
There are many scriptures, but I did not intend on using the bible; why do that here? Anyway one is in psalms 104:1-2 it says god clothed himself with honour and majesty, and gave himself light, or covered himself; which means he created those parts of himself. If he already had it before, what need would he have to give it to himself again? So this scripture, and others like it reveal that god actually created parts of himself.
And I am giving the evidence that I have as I go; that's all I can do. If others don't view it as evidence, what can I do?
(June 6, 2014 at 1:08 pm)Chas Wrote: Physics and chemistry.
What selected physics and chemistry? To avoid infinite regression I say God began it all.
(June 6, 2014 at 1:10 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: Why do you believe scriptures are reliable concerning any supernatural god claim?
Because the bible is a proven historical book, and biblical archaeology is yet another proof of god.
"To you"? Who the fuck are you?
You see, You are of no importance whatsoever, even less so your perception. So present evidence for your conjecture, and propose a practicable way by which your conjecture can be verified or refuted, that way it shows at least there is some evidence you have thought about how to eliminate self dilusion and wishthinking from your perceptions.
Do this and what you say may be worth a glance or two. Keep saying what things seem to you, and exhibit no evidence you've done anything to separate mental masturbation from honest proposal, you can go home right now and now waste any more of anyone else's time.
Why are you wasting your time reading what I have to say if I am of no importance?
Infinite regression is a philosophical non-issue.
Name one problem caused by potential infinite regression that is not philosophically or epistemically solvable.
Even assuming an infinite chain of events up until this point, nothing would change.
In fact, the chain of events from before the beginning of time to modern day is, by definition, infinite.
