RE: A reason to believe?
May 3, 2010 at 4:33 pm
(This post was last modified: May 3, 2010 at 4:36 pm by Paul the Human.)
(May 3, 2010 at 4:08 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Y thankyou
In your position I don't think I was so generous.. so kudos to you (emoticon removed, because I hate them)
Thanks. I am a strong supporter of individual liberty and that includes religion. I do not condemn anyone on a personal level until they do something to deserve my scorn. And it takes a lot usually.
(May 3, 2010 at 4:08 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: If all it were a delusion, but it did actually increase measurably one's happiness quotient... this would be a valid reason to believe, no?
I suppose someone could consider that a reason to believe, but if they did... they probably don't really believe... which would interfere with the whole 'placebo effect' they were going for by choosing to delude themselves. *laughs*
It doesn't cut it as a reason for me, because I know that a happy life is quite easily attainable without a god's help. Not even a pretend one.
(May 3, 2010 at 4:08 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(May 3, 2010 at 3:50 pm)Paul the Human Wrote: (stupid emoticon removed)You made the tiger emote sad. That was mean.
Expect a visitation from some kickass godesses of PAIN soon!
The goddesses are far too nice to condemn me for disliking emoticons. See... I am not telling them they can't use them... only that I won't. Ha!
Oh... and to clarify: I only dislike the big animated ones. Regular 'smilies' aren't too bad in moderation.