3 Questions For Believers (A work in progress.)

[fr0d0]

Philosopher of religion Keith Ward has said scientism is philosophically inconsistent or even self-refuting, as the truth of the statements "no statements are true unless they can be proven scientifically (or logically)" or "no statements are true unless they can be shown empirically to be true" cannot themselves be proven scientifically, logically, or empirically.

More from Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is an accessible and unbiased source that we can both use in my opinion rumpy. The above statement is particularly damming of your assertion.

I'm not saying that the viewpoint, seemingly widely held by atheists, is not without some merit. I do find it to be very weak though.