A Serious Question For Theists

[Esquilax]

If that were true, you would stop showcasing and go look up the word and see that it explains why. I've linked it for you, you have no excuse.

I looked, and then if you look, you'll see I corrected you: we're talking about evidence in general, not merely empirically measured scientific standards. At least, that's what I was talking about when I made the first statement you responded to, the idea that you should need some indication of a thing before you believe it exists.

Was this really just one long exercise in demonstrating how poor your reading comprehension is?

I suspect though that you're far more interested in stroking your ego.

Goodness, we wouldn't want anyone doing that would we!