(June 16, 2014 at 7:17 am)fr0d0 Wrote: If that were true, you would stop showcasing and go look up the word and see that it explains why. I've linked it for you, you have no excuse.
I looked, and then if you look, you'll see I corrected you: we're talking about evidence in general, not merely empirically measured scientific standards. At least, that's what I was talking about when I made the first statement you responded to, the idea that you should need some indication of a thing before you believe it exists.
Was this really just one long exercise in demonstrating how poor your reading comprehension is?
Quote:I suspect though that you're far more interested in stroking your ego.
Goodness, we wouldn't want anyone doing that would we!

"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!