A Serious Question For Theists

[Esquilax]

Yes I ignored your dodge.

Dodge?! I started the fucking conversation with that line! You can't dodge by referring to the initial point of discussion!

What evidence besides empirical evidence would you be prepared to accept?

As I've said earlier, your willingness to open the field to include non empirical evidence is a smokescreen. You have no idea what that means, you're just using it as a get out clause.

It's not a smokescreen, I am willing to consider the idea of other evidence types; you seem to think that some exist, unless you're being an intractable loon. I'm asking what you think those are, and your utter refusal to engage in the conversation hints at the fact that you don't know what you're talking about.

As regards evidence that isn't empirical, I'm prepared to consider pretty much any kind of evidence, presuming that it's in some way informed by reality. That's essentially my only requirement, as claims made without reference to the world that we exist in have no point of origin and no method of verification.

Still I see you refuse to do any leg work. I guess you're just not interested in anything but your own ideas.

This is fascinating: you make a claim, and then spend the rest of your time in the thread tutting at everyone else for not doing the work to support it for you. Is there no end to your bs?