RE: A Serious Question For Theists
June 17, 2014 at 11:41 am
(This post was last modified: June 17, 2014 at 11:41 am by fr0d0.)
(June 17, 2014 at 11:08 am)Tonus Wrote:(June 17, 2014 at 9:54 am)fr0d0 Wrote: If you're denying rational, which is what I think scientism is doing besides being self defeating (1), then I can't see how that position is tenableOh. That's a different definition than I was assuming. I don't think science needs to deal in that kind of absolute. But I think any discipline that purports to prove something needs to provide evidence that we can at least consider for discussion and that follows some sort of rules. And I think it's the rules part that makes the supernatural (or metaphysics, etc) impossible to verify.
What does it want to prove?
I don't think it wants to prove anything. I don't claim that God exists... I believe that God exists. I think the rule is that you can't prove it. If you could then it would be false.