Evolution 'proved' wrong

[Esquilax]

Yep, not afraid to hold everything up to robust analysis...
There's only one logical answer, whatever that may be.
And I'll keep looking for the bastard until I'm satisfied.

I will scoop my hands in the manure to try to sift out any nuggets of truth...
Not afraid to get my hand's dirty...

You do understand that the article tells an outright lie to you within four paragraphs of starting, right? Three, if you don't count the opening line as a paragraph. You do understand that the second section mistakes abiogenesis for evolution, yes? The very first "fact" that proves evolution is an argument from ignorance, "why would birds evolve wings?" and we live in a world with plenty of gliding animals to show why. The second "fact" is just a loud assertion that there are no transitional forms because... the writer of the piece doesn't want there to be, I guess. To get there, he roundly misunderstands what the term "transitional form" actually means. The third fact just outright ignores that we know the majority of species on the planet have gone extinct, and that fossilization is a rarity for various mechanical reasons.

I could go on, if you like, but shouldn't the fact that they literally lie to you in the first image present in the article (go back to my post on page 2 to see how) hint that this is agenda driven and not concerned with facts?