(May 30, 2014 at 9:21 pm)BlackSwordsman Wrote:

(May 30, 2014 at 9:09 pm)Cato Wrote: You're fucking joking, right?

From the article:

Do you really expect me to take any of this seriously?

Surely not, but there seems to be alot of people trying to debate evolution.

Trying, yes. Always trying.

There's nothing stopping them debating. Trouble is, they always fall at the first hurdle.

man, this is amazing!
it does make a lot of sense ... I still need to see who is peddling this...
I'll crack it if it's Jehovas or scientologists!

(June 17, 2014 at 7:42 am)ignoramus Wrote: man, this is amazing!
it does make a lot of sense ... I still need to see who is peddling this...
I'll crack it if it's Jehovas or scientologists!

Worse... it's American evangelical creationists.

(June 17, 2014 at 7:50 am)Ben Davis Wrote:

(June 17, 2014 at 7:42 am)ignoramus Wrote: man, this is amazing!
it does make a lot of sense ... I still need to see who is peddling this...
I'll crack it if it's Jehovas or scientologists!

Worse... it's American evangelical creationists.

The foremost experts in evolution in the US to the general public there, naturally.

Even in a pile of bullshit, can a flower grow!
Some parts have got me curious, which I'm investigating.

(June 18, 2014 at 4:11 am)ignoramus Wrote: Even in a pile of bullshit, can a flower grow!
Some parts have got me curious, which I'm investigating.

Are you... being serious? I can't... is this serious enthusiasm for that bullshit?

Yep, not afraid to hold everything up to robust analysis...
There's only one logical answer, whatever that may be.
And I'll keep looking for the bastard until I'm satisfied.

I will scoop my hands in the manure to try to sift out any nuggets of truth...
Not afraid to get my hand's dirty...

(June 18, 2014 at 5:51 am)ignoramus Wrote: Yep, not afraid to hold everything up to robust analysis...
There's only one logical answer, whatever that may be.
And I'll keep looking for the bastard until I'm satisfied.

I will scoop my hands in the manure to try to sift out any nuggets of truth...
Not afraid to get my hand's dirty...

You do understand that the article tells an outright lie to you within four paragraphs of starting, right? Three, if you don't count the opening line as a paragraph. You do understand that the second section mistakes abiogenesis for evolution, yes? The very first "fact" that proves evolution is an argument from ignorance, "why would birds evolve wings?" and we live in a world with plenty of gliding animals to show why. The second "fact" is just a loud assertion that there are no transitional forms because... the writer of the piece doesn't want there to be, I guess. To get there, he roundly misunderstands what the term "transitional form" actually means. The third fact just outright ignores that we know the majority of species on the planet have gone extinct, and that fossilization is a rarity for various mechanical reasons.

I could go on, if you like, but shouldn't the fact that they literally lie to you in the first image present in the article (go back to my post on page 2 to see how) hint that this is agenda driven and not concerned with facts?

But how could they lie to me! I trusted them ...they are religious good people!
Nurse! Nurse! NUUUUUURSE!