I try to see things from their point of view for exercise.
Generally I fail.
Do they see rights as something external to themselves and immutable like gravity or conservation of momentum?
They can go anti-Locke and not consent to be governed, but they'd better be able to enforce their decision or be willing to bear the consequences.
Generally I fail.
Do they see rights as something external to themselves and immutable like gravity or conservation of momentum?
They can go anti-Locke and not consent to be governed, but they'd better be able to enforce their decision or be willing to bear the consequences.
So how, exactly, does God know that She's NOT a brain in a vat? 
