About other gods-question for theists

[FatAndFaithless]

So why not be a Jew?

The answer is found in Romans 11

---

11 I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.

2 God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias? how he maketh intercession to God against Israel saying,

3 Lord, they have killed thy prophets, and digged down thine altars; and I am left alone, and they seek my life.

4 But what saith the answer of God unto him? I have reserved to myself seven thousand men, who have not bowed the knee to the image of Baal.

5 Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace.

6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.

7 What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded.

8 (According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear) unto this day.

9 And David saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompence unto them:

10 Let their eyes be darkened, that they may not see, and bow down their back alway.

11 I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy.

---

The point is that those who think they have found internal confirmation of god, are only seeing what they want or expect to see.

I never said I found internal confirmation of God. I said God did a working upon me. That's external confirmation.

This boils down to:

A says B is right.
C says B is right.
A and C are sometimes wrong.
Therefore B is right.

No it doesn't. Your third premise appears nowhere in the argument I have made. You are misrepresenting my argument.

It's also based on a couple of false premises. First neither the Koran nor the Book of Mormon say that the Bible in inerrant,

I didn't claim they did.

Second, The Bible is full of logical contradictions.

For example....

And the Old Testament is largely negated by the New, or at least so many Christians who don't want to stone rape victims tell me.

Do Christian's live in a theocracy?

Judaism doesn’t give a crap what Romans says, seeing as it’s part of the NT. You said that the Bible was logically consistent internally (debatable). So is the Torah. You can’t use a part of your religion as “internally consistent” as then use it to invalidate another religion which doesn’t use that part at all. The Jews are just as (in my opinion moreso) logically consistent than your Bible.