SCOTUS Rules In Favor Of Hobby Lobby

[John V]

The hypocrisy regarding 401(k) holdings charge is ridiculous. How often do those of you making the charge review the holdings in your own 401(k)s?

Suppose you go to sign a petition condemning a company for using child labor somewhere in the world. Do you check every company that's been held by the mutual funds in your 401(k)s before signing in order to avoid hypocrisy? Or do you figure, hey, I can't fight every battle, but that doesn't make me a hypocrite for fighting some of them?

---

Oh look, another foolish neo-con that thinks women aren't paying attention. Want to mansplain that some more for them? Worked so well for you imbeciles in 2012.

Current opinion is roughly split with a slight edge in favor of employers' rights, and most people say it's not very important to them.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_c..._39_oppose

Half of voters agree with the U.S. Supreme Court that a business owner should be able to opt out of Obamacare’s contraceptive mandate if it violates his or her religious beliefs. But most also say a company’s level of contraceptive coverage is not that important to their decision to work there.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 43% of Likely U.S. Voters think businesses should be required by law to provide health insurance that covers all government-approved contraceptives for women without co-payments or other charges to the patient. Slightly more (47%) say companies should not be required to meet this contraceptive mandate included in the new national health care law. Ten percent (10%) are not sure.