RE: SCOTUS Rules In Favor Of Hobby Lobby
July 3, 2014 at 1:27 pm
(This post was last modified: July 3, 2014 at 1:39 pm by Ryantology.)
(July 3, 2014 at 10:43 am)Heywood Wrote: They were required to pay for contraceptive coverage. Nobody disputes this but you.
No, they were required to pay for health insurance that might be used to purchase contraceptives (and which currently may be used to purchase Viagra and vasectomies because this is absolutely 100% about sex discrimination at the root of it). How is this different from them giving a cash benefit that might be used to purchase contraceptives? How is this so hard for you to grasp?
Heywood Wrote:In other words we are letting the employee determine how to allocate the compensation they recieve for their labor instead of some liberaltard elitest telling them how to do it.
The reason liberaltards want employers to provide contraception coverage is because they think women are too stupid to buy it on their own.
I would be okay with the idea as long as the bonus would be enough to cover the cost of contraceptives without insurance. I have not seen a single liberal here dispute this as a bad idea. It's just that it won't ever happen because it would be just as big a violation of Hobby Lobby's alleged religious faith to provide this extra item specifically as an allowance for those who choose to use it to purchase birth control. It gives the employee more freedom, but it doesn't matter because the company would never agree to it. And you know this, because you have no problem, personally, with what happened, but you want to pretend you're more enlightened than your more honest fellow extremists.