Arguments about evolution based on "information" are primarily throwing the word "information" on top of a standard creationist argument to make it sound scientific. The argument that mutations only decrease information is basically the same old argument that mutations are always harmful, only using the word "information" to make it sound scientific. There is no process in evolution, information or otherwise, which prevents beneficial mutations (increases of information) from occurring. It's just a scientifically sounding update of an old argument.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 26, 2024, 7:38 am
Thread Rating:
Question about creationist argument
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)