SCOTUS Rules In Favor Of Hobby Lobby

[John V]

Sure,

Do you have some examples of that?

the difference here is that we know how Hobby Lobby is investing.

We know because some opponents of Hobby Lobby went digging for the information. Do they actively look for 401k hypocrisy when considering someone's position (including allies) as a matter of course? If not, why not?

So, do you always resort to strawmen when your positions are indefensible?

First, what's the straw man?

Second, I refrained from pointing out that the 401k/hypocrisy issue is a red herring, but now I'll note it. Do you always resort to red herrings when your opponent's positions are defensible?

Back to the story.

Interesting - admission that the 401k/hypocrisy angle is a red herring.