Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 13, 2025, 6:51 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A discussion around family table.
#70
RE: A discussion around family table.


How many times do I have to say this; I have experienced God, I have experienced His affects on this world, and I understand His nature. Applying that to the Bible, which was writte by men who believed in God, I can see what they were getting at because I've seen the lessons and the workings myself, in real life.



Ga!- fu!- Sonuva!- *eyeball twitches*

I am following God. The Bible is a fixed reference because, to me, it does the best job of any holy book of describing in words the experiences I have had and the lessos I have observed about life. It does not get it completely, 100% correct, but it comes pretty damn close.

Quote:Lots of deaths and misery have resulted from people doing just that with your biblebook.
And lots of good, too. Your point?



Good for you, I'm glad you could share your misinformed feelings on the Bible. None of this had any relevance. Any of it.













Quote:But you are if all the lessons are individual and not clearly the same for everyone.
No, I am saying that everyone experiences them differently, but that they are still the same lessons..








Quote:The bible does NOT say the god parts and effect descriptions are true, but the rest is not.
It is fucking implied, that's the whole point of the Bible; to understand it, not just know it. You can't understand what you haven't experienced. It's like saying you're an expert on marijuana without ever having been high.




Quote:Ok, fine, but I still can't take your word on it, and I still want to see where the bible makes that clear to me, not you. If it's a holy book, it should at least be clear about what it's messages and facts/metaphors are.
Againl it is fucking implied. That's the whole goddamn point. Ugh!



















Quote:I would if that book were claiming to be the path to happiness, goodness, and truth and change for the better, etc.
Not if that book was written by men, you wouldn't.










Quote:In other words, here you are taking the bible literally.
No, I am not; I do not know if Jesus Christ ever existed or not. I believe in His existence as a concept; that is, it is entirely probable for God to act in the way He does in the story of Jesus Christ.




Quote:Ok, so.... where is that evidence?
As I have stated many times, it is subjective evidence; empirical, scientific evidence is not the only kind of evidence possible.

Quote:What was shown to be accurate and how.
The effects of God and denying/accepting Him have proven to affect human nature in my observances of such things time and time again.

Quote:Why would you need faith in observing anything? Doesn't that skew the results in favour of your predetermined faithbelief?
No, it does not. Trust is an off-shoot of faith; I trust the world around me is how it appears, therefore I have faith it is how it appears. I am then ready to make unbiased observations about the world around me, as it appears.

Quote:All that tells me is that you experienced love, not that an invisible universe creator exists.
I am telling you that love is God, and that love is simply another word for the creator of the universe.

Also, God is not invisible. He is all around us, in forms we must look for and recognize as such.

Quote:Nonsense, I bask and whatever in life without any need for a god or gods, so why would a person need an invisible friend to enjoy life to their best?
Again, God is not invisible; God is all of life. Therefore, to truly apprecite and understand life, one must accept God. This is a simple concept. It is a Christian belief. I don't expect you to believe it, I just expect you to try and understand it.

Quote:You're going to have to. I look and look, but can't find anything but shit in that book.
Because you aren't looking at it correctly.



I haven't read the Bible, actually. I don't care to know the details to the stories, because those aren't the parts which are important to the message; the funny thing is, they are the only parts that you focus on.

Quote:Explain this common sense please. I'm not seeing it.
It's called understanding. When you read a book, you don't simply read the book to know what happens within it; you read it to understand what happens within it. Knowledge and understanding are not synonymous nor co-dependent.







Quote:Sounds good, I agree. Let's dump the bible and move on. It's 2010 people.
Want to write a new Bible? Okay, let's go for it! ...Oh, wait. You're an atheist, so...it would be kind of counter-productive to involve you. Confused







Quote:Where does it say that?
Implication. Intent. Rinse. Repeat.

I don't know how many times I have to tell you this.




[/hide]

I want to put this whole thing into a hide tag, but I can't seem to. Because, holy shit is it long. This is an interesting discussion, though, I'm enjoying myself!
Reply



Messages In This Thread
A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 4, 2010 at 1:16 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by padraic - May 4, 2010 at 5:54 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by bozo - May 4, 2010 at 12:18 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 4, 2010 at 1:22 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by bozo - May 4, 2010 at 1:58 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 4, 2010 at 2:58 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 4, 2010 at 5:07 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 4, 2010 at 5:29 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Godschild - May 5, 2010 at 12:38 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 5, 2010 at 3:35 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 4, 2010 at 5:50 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 5, 2010 at 5:19 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 6, 2010 at 4:40 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tavarish - May 6, 2010 at 6:19 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 6, 2010 at 7:30 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 6, 2010 at 8:34 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 7, 2010 at 10:48 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 9, 2010 at 6:01 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 6, 2010 at 7:02 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 6, 2010 at 7:42 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 6, 2010 at 9:59 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 9, 2010 at 9:00 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 9, 2010 at 12:29 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 9, 2010 at 4:44 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 10, 2010 at 2:31 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 10, 2010 at 2:44 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 10, 2010 at 6:42 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 11, 2010 at 3:00 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 11, 2010 at 5:52 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 10, 2010 at 7:55 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 10, 2010 at 2:44 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 11, 2010 at 10:01 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 12, 2010 at 9:57 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 11, 2010 at 5:34 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 13, 2010 at 9:23 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Violet - May 13, 2010 at 9:25 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 13, 2010 at 9:50 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 13, 2010 at 6:00 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 13, 2010 at 6:43 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 14, 2010 at 12:03 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 14, 2010 at 12:37 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 17, 2010 at 4:36 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 18, 2010 at 12:07 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 19, 2010 at 4:51 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 18, 2010 at 3:20 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 18, 2010 at 6:08 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 19, 2010 at 2:53 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 19, 2010 at 7:34 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 19, 2010 at 12:03 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 22, 2010 at 9:26 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 22, 2010 at 1:16 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by AngelThMan - May 22, 2010 at 10:23 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 22, 2010 at 10:51 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 23, 2010 at 12:31 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 23, 2010 at 11:22 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 25, 2010 at 1:53 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 26, 2010 at 4:56 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 26, 2010 at 8:03 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Ace Otana - May 26, 2010 at 8:36 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Godschild - May 24, 2010 at 1:10 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Godschild - May 25, 2010 at 12:57 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 26, 2010 at 9:11 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by KichigaiNeko - May 26, 2010 at 10:53 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Minimalist - May 26, 2010 at 2:48 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 26, 2010 at 4:11 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Ace Otana - May 26, 2010 at 5:37 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 27, 2010 at 2:07 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 27, 2010 at 9:31 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 27, 2010 at 4:51 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Natural family planning LinuxGal 75 14491 January 1, 2023 at 10:30 am
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Christian family fined after arguing taxes 'against God's will' zebo-the-fat 19 3436 July 23, 2019 at 1:26 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Why does my family want me to be christian so much? Der/die AtheistIn 17 4079 March 29, 2018 at 7:12 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  Disappointing my family Der/die AtheistIn 9 2400 December 23, 2017 at 9:59 am
Last Post: Aoi Magi
  Mother Marches Through Target With Her Family To Protest Transgender Bathroom Policy" TubbyTubby 6 2163 May 17, 2016 at 12:21 pm
Last Post: abaris
  How would you suggest going about dealing with an ignorant extended family member GoHalos1993 21 5134 January 1, 2016 at 7:02 pm
Last Post: SteelCurtain
  Whoopi speaks out against the duggar family dyresand 49 15155 June 10, 2015 at 1:49 pm
Last Post: Pyrrho
  New result on Jesus family ossuaries watchamadoodle 20 6113 April 16, 2015 at 2:27 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Yeah....Way Too Many Fucking Morons Running Around Loose in this Country Minimalist 37 11066 February 3, 2015 at 12:08 am
Last Post: Ravenshire
  Dealing with Religious Family wolfclan96 22 6420 January 16, 2015 at 8:13 pm
Last Post: wolfclan96



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)