(July 8, 2014 at 9:54 pm)Jenny A Wrote:(July 8, 2014 at 9:31 pm)Blackout Wrote: The thing is controlling fascism IS controlling the government and limiting it. Why? Because fascism advocates a regime of 'all for the nation, none against the nation', your interests are submitted to the nation's interest and you lose your rights, the government controls everything from schools to the media and they control who works and how much you produce... Basically in fascism there is a lot of government control and planning, therefore preventing fascism is preventing government planning, it's precisely because we don't trust governments that once appeared nice that we limited fascism, if fascism reached power the same story would repeat again.
Theoretically, our current system of government with checks and balances makes such a regime impossible, but don't ask me about it in the wee hours of the morning.
(July 8, 2014 at 9:31 pm)Blackout Wrote: I'm curious to ask something, is your two party system based solely on two parties, or are there actually other minor parties that no one votes in?No, there are other political parties and here and there they hold an elected office or two. And we've changed which two are prominent from time to time. Lincoln was a Republican which was a relatively new party at the time he was elected.
(July 8, 2014 at 9:31 pm)Blackout Wrote: Your system seems similar to the british bipartidary systemNo, not really. The British have a parliamentary system in which parliament is ultimately in control as it elects the Prime Minister and can oust him at anytime. That leads to one party control.
We have two independent legislative houses, neither of which elects the president, who may be and often is of a different party than the majority in one or both houses. Both houses are required to pass legislation. Absent impeachment and a trial the legislature cannot oust the president. It's been tried twice, but we've never removed a sitting president, though Nixon resigned.
Further our elections of house and senate members are staggered so only a few legislators are up for election in any election year.
I know about the Senate and Congress, I was just pointing out a similarity between the bipartidary system. The british have a parliamentary system and the chief of state (the queen) has zero political power. Your system is a presidentialist one, but isn't impeachment process enough to remove the president?
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you