RE: Evolution Facts
July 12, 2014 at 3:51 am
(This post was last modified: July 12, 2014 at 3:55 am by Mystical.)
Quote:How do species split?What causes speciation? And what evidence do we have that speciation has ever occurred?
Critics of evolution often fall back on the maxim that no one has ever seen one species split into two. While that’s clearly a straw man, because most speciation takes far longer than our lifespan to occur, it’s also not true. We have seen species split, and we continue to see species diverging every day.
From flowers to Orcas to dogs to bacteria, we see new species evolve all around us.
Here's a good thorough list:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/scienc...8Df2fd5u5k
Here are some of my favorites:
Live Birth in Three-toed Skinks
![[Image: the-three-toed-skink-saiphos-equalis.jpg...=550%2C288]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i2.wp.com%2Flistverse.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fthe-three-toed-skink-saiphos-equalis.jpg%3Fzoom%3D1.5%26amp%3Bresize%3D550%252C288)
Speciation involves many mutations leading to significant changes. The yellow bellied three-toed skink (Saiphos equalis) is a lizard of New South Wales, in Australia, that appears to be undergoing the change from laying eggs to live birth. Since these skinks can either lay eggs or give birth, it gives scientists the chance to study the adaptations necessary for live birth. Skink embryos encased in an egg have an extra source of calcium that the live born skinks lack. It turns out that this nutritional difference is made up by the mother secreting extra calcium for the young held inside her. This looks like the first step on the road to developing a system like the mammalian placenta. Skinks living on the coast tend to lay eggs, probably because the warm weather is predictable and sufficient for embryonic development. Those skinks living in the cooler mountains tend to give birth to live young, the mother’s body providing a more stable temperature. It is to be predicted that these two populations will at some point separate into different species as each population becomes fixed in its reproductive strategy.
This brings up a common question in creationists – If man evolved from apes, why are there still apes? Well, with the skinks we would see two species formed, an egg laying and a live birthing species. Each would be best suited for their habitat. If live birthing skinks evolved from egg layers, why are there still egg layers? Because each is adapted for its niche.
For more examples:
http://listverse.com/2011/11/19/8-exampl...in-action/
Pictures: Nine Fish With "Hands" Found to Be New Species
![[Image: new-handfish-species-pink_20881_600x450.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=images.nationalgeographic.com%2Fwpf%2Fmedia-live%2Fphotos%2F000%2F208%2Fcache%2Fnew-handfish-species-pink_20881_600x450.jpg)
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/...-pictures/
Omnivore pirahna relative
![[Image: pacu-fish-6%25255B6%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=lh5.ggpht.com%2F-1_eM4uU0m0w%2FUvxRCKY4oVI%2FAAAAAAAAv7E%2F0gbipS-Q2T8%2Fpacu-fish-6%2525255B6%2525255D.jpg%3Fimgmax%3D800)
Pacu is related to the meat-eating piranha, both sharing the same subfamily Serrasalminae, although they have different food habits. The piranha is a carnivorous species while the pacu is omnivorous with vegetative tendencies. The difference is evident in the structure of their teeth. Piranha have pointed, razor-sharp teeth whereas pacu have squarer, straighter teeth, that eerily resemble those of humans.
![[Image: pacu-fish-5%25255B2%25255D.jpg?imgmax=800]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=lh5.ggpht.com%2F-xdKngm9HL6o%2FUvxRPAJUt9I%2FAAAAAAAAv7k%2Fo5yODErD2_o%2Fpacu-fish-5%2525255B2%2525255D.jpg%3Fimgmax%3D800)
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
![[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]](https://66.media.tumblr.com/5fb74c6d16622fb3dbb358509c9aec03/tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif)