RE: Jesus's sacrifice
May 16, 2010 at 5:25 pm
(This post was last modified: May 16, 2010 at 5:34 pm by fr0d0.)
(May 16, 2010 at 5:06 pm)Paul the Human Wrote: Sin is a wholly religious concept, so I will leave the hypothetical definitions of the word to you. The confusion between you and Shell and I is due to a collision of creationist and cosmological 'origin of everything' theories. In the cosmological view, the 'non-existence' that came before 'existence'... is different than the nothing that is the opposite of what things 'are'. I don't think this is constructive territory to tread upon.You're chicken. I can see that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a04db/a04db6ded21f9061a67790682148b1f19890b45c" alt="Big Grin Big Grin"
(May 16, 2010 at 5:24 pm)Paul the Human Wrote: Back to the original topic...Hey I just popped in to kudos Shell and make a small point
So, god (in the form of Jesus) came to earth to live as a human so that he could experience the nothingness of sin. That was the sacrifice. Death and subsequent ascension were the end of the sacrificing, then, and not the sacrifice itself.
Is that what you're saying here, fr0d0?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92868/92868735cdaa5f3c6a32c0fa84134c16065ead08" alt="Tongue Tongue"
Nah, God didn't need to experience it, but set up a stooge that humans could relate to. The momentous statement was the abolition of sacrifice of course. There's now nothing between us and the attainment of the ultimate in positivity.