(July 13, 2014 at 10:19 pm)alexwenzel Wrote: You gave me this really long link to read to give me an example of a new species? Why don't you just mention a few in here? I read it thru and didn't see mentioning any new species.
Yes, I gave you a long link: the number of observed speciation events is so voluminous that it requires such a long link to cover them all. That's literally how wrong you are. As for not seeing any new species, the entire report was nothing more than a list of them, divided according to taxonomy. You would have to have not read the thing to not see any.
Quote:Yeah about Darwin now that we are a boarding the subject. There is one thing that has been bothering me, and I was wondering if anyone can give me some info about that.
It is the law of entropy. The digression of the matter and energy in the universe to an ultimate state of inert uniformity. In other words, if you look at records there has only been extinctions of species. There has never been any new species recorded.
Wow, are you ever wrong. The second law of thermodynamics, which concerns itself with entropy, states that the entropy of a closed system never decreases. Entropy, by the way, is a measure of disorder, not inertness, so you're even wrong about your own definitions.
Which is moot anyway, since we don't live in a closed system. If you're going to argue that the Earth is a closed system, you're essentially arguing that the sun doesn't exist. Does the sun exist, Alex?
![Dodgy Dodgy](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/dodgy.gif)
Quote:They have tried to prove evolution using millions of fruit flies, since early 1900. They haven't observed not even a little change of an enzyme. Their conclusion was that "fruit flies appear to be immune to evolution."
Bullshit! Diane Dodd was causing fruit flies to speciate and change using reproductive isolation over a decade ago! You're just lying, here.
Quote:Same experiment has been conducted with bacterias that have a lifespan of 15 minutes through many many years. Again, no evolution was observed, despite the exposure to chemicals, radiation and etc.
Oof, wrong again! Here's a bacteria that was coaxed to evolve the ability to digest nylon- a substance that didn't exist before 1935- in a laboratory setting, after scientists observed a natural species also evolving that ability while living in runoff from a nylon factory.
Quote:If you want to know more about this, look at the video below my friend. It is very easy to understand and very informative. It is not a message of I am right and you are wrong. Let me know if I can help. - Alex :-)
Why the hell would we "want to know more" about what you're saying? You've been factually wrong on every claim you've made! More importantly, your broader claim that we've never seen new species emerge is demonstrably wrong according to pictures and evidence posted on the first page of this thread!
Why should any of us want to know more incorrect information from a person who apparently doesn't care a whit about truth?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!