Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 21, 2025, 9:06 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A discussion around family table.
#93
RE: A discussion around family table.
(May 20, 2010 at 5:12 am)tackattack Wrote: To save time I'll bold what's relevant and comment in red

(May 19, 2010 at 7:24 am)Scented Nectar Wrote:
(May 19, 2010 at 2:53 am)tackattack Wrote: Good is of course relative, but I think all of it's good for a read, I've read worse. Do I need to quote all the exploits of Jesus/ disciples doing good deeds, healing, helping, filling the needs of the outcast and needy?
Sure, if these good acts cancel out the bad ones. They say Hitler treated dogs well, you know. Does that make everything else he did ok?Please list Jesus' bad deeds since you at least admit he had some good deeds and I'll respond, but only if you're genuinely intersted in hearing the response.
Summed up better than I could ever do, here is a page from http://www.evilbible.com/what_would_jesus_do.htm I'm not sure what bible version they are using.

Do any of the good things he did outweigh the bad things to the point where they cancel it out?

Quote:
Quote:The court must not kill anybody on circumstantial evidence Ex. 23:7
It actually says "Keep thee far from a false matter; and the innocent and righteous slay thou not: for I will not justify the wicked." Where do you see anything about circumstantial evidence? Maybe you should stop listening to the preacher man and read the thing yourself. So far, that quote fully upholds killing people for bible 'crimes'.Is it really Gymanstics to say that you shouldn't kill the innocent? innocent in a court of law requires solid evidence
Since the bible is thoroughly immoral in what it considers innocent, righteous and wicked, all it is saying is that that is still so. There is nothing about evidence being circumstantial or not, or about evidence at all in this verse.

Quote:
Quote:The court must not punish anybody who was forced to do a crime Deut. 22:26
It says nothing of the sort. It says "But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for as when a man riseth against his neighbour, and slayeth him, even so is this matter:" They are referring to not punishing a woman for being a rape victim only if she is betrothed. If she is not, then she is still murdered by the godlovers. (YLT)25 “But if the man meets the engaged woman out in the country, and he rapes her, then only the man must die. 26 Do nothing to the young woman; she has committed no crime worthy of death. She is as innocent as a murder victim. 27 Since the man raped her out in the country, it must be assumed that she screamed, but there was no one to rescue her." That's all that is said, she shall not be put to death.. innocent as a murder victim.
Let's use the KJV since as far as I know, that is the oldest English version around these days:



Quote:
Quote:Judge righteously Lev. 19:15
That completely upholds the immoral laws, since they are considered righteous and god-commanded. "Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour."(YLT)15 “Do not twist justice in legal matters by favoring the poor or being partial to the rich and powerful. Always judge people fairly." No it doesn't it's talking about favoritism
It's not the wealth part that was presented to me, the righteous part was. I simply quoted the entire verse. Anyways, being cruel/immoral to everyone rather than just some people doesn't really make it all better, you know?

Quote:
Quote:The court must not execute through a majority of one; at least a majority of two is required Ex. 23:2
It actually says "Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil; neither shalt thou speak in a cause to decline after many to wrest judgment", the last part sounding like an order to not speak out against what the multitude have judged.(YLT)2 “You must not follow the crowd in doing wrong. When you are called to testify in a dispute, do not be swayed by the crowd to twist justice." Are we going by what it sounds like or what it says?
In other words, and I know you like other words, don't join any anti-cruelty crowds or speak out against god ordered cruelty to stop the (in)'justice'. I get it.

Quote:
Quote:Not to press them for payment if you know they don't have it Ex. 22:24
That is the same verse as above. Should I infer that after feeding the dead body to the poor, to tell them not to bother about paying you back someday?Should be vs. 26-27 "26 If you take your neighbor’s cloak as security for a loan, you must return it before sunset. 27 This coat may be the only blanket your neighbor has. How can a person sleep without it? If you do not return it and your neighbor cries out to me for help, then I will hear, for I am merciful."
What is the punishment for the meanness of taking someone's sleeping blanket as collateral for a loan? Nothing. God simply says he will hear the cry (and then brags about being gracious),

Quote:
Quote:Not to insult or harm anybody with words Lev. 25:17
Good thing it does not actually say that, since that would destroy all free speech, but let's see what it really says. "Ye shall not therefore oppress one another; but thou shalt fear thy God:for I am the LORD your God." Nothing indicating what would be oppressive, so it must be concluded that they mean anything against the god commands. The second part is a command to have an emotion, fear. Do you often love people you fear? I don't, but then again, I've never had Stockholm's Syndrome.There is part of that verse with some arbitrary fear thrown in, but you're implying that only opression of God's commands when we all feel obression is bad
I'm not implying anything. I meant exactly what I wrote. You bring up a good point though, making me wonder if there is any type of oppression that your god does not actively condone/order. Let's see, sexual oppression check, child abuse check, nationality oppression check, religious oppression check, am I leaving anything out? What nonbible oppression are you referring to?

Quote:Should be Deteronomy 25:16 (NLT) "16 All who cheat with dishonest weights and measures are detestable to the Lord your God." ALthough I agree the exodus verse is about destruction of people with differing beliefs
So I guess the nice law about not cheating with weights makes up for slaughter/genocide? I'm looking for examples of stuff in the bible so so so good, that the bad shit is insignificant in comparison. Can you provide that? Also, deut 25:16 is:
16For all that do such things, and all that do unrighteously, are an abomination unto the LORD thy God.

Quote:That was supposed to read the NIV not KJV sorry. You're still denying it says the word... stop arguing the semantics. The Bible didn't originally say homosexual, it got put into the Bible and was popular for a long time. Now people are getting back to the meaning of the words and other version are becoming more popular, especially among Biblical hermeneutics. [/color]
Why did you bring up new, recently written bibles that use the word homosexual as proof that it said so 2000 years ago? It didn't. Stick with the oldest of the English versions. That's what all the changed ones started out from (in this language, that is).

Quote:Whether people suffer or not in that afterlife is a matter of speculation. It's not that God would chose to kill their soul, it either exists or doesn't. If it does and you're not prepared, you get what you get.[/color]
It's not speculation to a xtian. God punishes or rewards during the afterlife based on what you do in this one. It has nothing to do with whether there actually is some sort of afterlife.

Quote:I am attempting to show you that yes there is bad, but it's outweighed by the good, especially in the instruction dept.
Ok, when are you going to do that?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 4, 2010 at 1:16 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by padraic - May 4, 2010 at 5:54 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by bozo - May 4, 2010 at 12:18 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 4, 2010 at 1:22 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by bozo - May 4, 2010 at 1:58 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 4, 2010 at 2:58 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 4, 2010 at 5:07 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 4, 2010 at 5:29 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Godschild - May 5, 2010 at 12:38 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 5, 2010 at 3:35 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 4, 2010 at 5:50 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 5, 2010 at 5:19 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 6, 2010 at 4:40 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tavarish - May 6, 2010 at 6:19 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 6, 2010 at 7:30 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 6, 2010 at 8:34 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 7, 2010 at 10:48 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 9, 2010 at 6:01 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 6, 2010 at 7:02 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 6, 2010 at 7:42 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 6, 2010 at 9:59 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 9, 2010 at 9:00 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 9, 2010 at 12:29 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 9, 2010 at 4:44 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 10, 2010 at 2:31 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Rwandrall - May 10, 2010 at 2:44 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 10, 2010 at 6:42 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 11, 2010 at 3:00 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 11, 2010 at 5:52 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 10, 2010 at 7:55 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 10, 2010 at 2:44 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 11, 2010 at 10:01 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 12, 2010 at 9:57 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 11, 2010 at 5:34 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 13, 2010 at 9:23 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Violet - May 13, 2010 at 9:25 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 13, 2010 at 9:50 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 13, 2010 at 6:00 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 13, 2010 at 6:43 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 14, 2010 at 12:03 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 14, 2010 at 12:37 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 17, 2010 at 4:36 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 18, 2010 at 12:07 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 19, 2010 at 4:51 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 18, 2010 at 3:20 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 18, 2010 at 6:08 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 19, 2010 at 2:53 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 19, 2010 at 7:34 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Watson - May 19, 2010 at 12:03 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 22, 2010 at 9:26 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 22, 2010 at 1:16 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by AngelThMan - May 22, 2010 at 10:23 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 22, 2010 at 10:51 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 23, 2010 at 12:31 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 23, 2010 at 11:22 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 25, 2010 at 1:53 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 26, 2010 at 4:56 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 26, 2010 at 8:03 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Ace Otana - May 26, 2010 at 8:36 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Godschild - May 24, 2010 at 1:10 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Godschild - May 25, 2010 at 12:57 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 26, 2010 at 9:11 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by KichigaiNeko - May 26, 2010 at 10:53 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Minimalist - May 26, 2010 at 2:48 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by fr0d0 - May 26, 2010 at 4:11 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by Ace Otana - May 26, 2010 at 5:37 pm
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 27, 2010 at 2:07 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 27, 2010 at 9:31 am
RE: A discussion around family table. - by tackattack - May 27, 2010 at 4:51 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Natural family planning LinuxGal 75 13569 January 1, 2023 at 10:30 am
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Christian family fined after arguing taxes 'against God's will' zebo-the-fat 19 3283 July 23, 2019 at 1:26 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Why does my family want me to be christian so much? Der/die AtheistIn 17 3891 March 29, 2018 at 7:12 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  Disappointing my family Der/die AtheistIn 9 2305 December 23, 2017 at 9:59 am
Last Post: Aoi Magi
  Mother Marches Through Target With Her Family To Protest Transgender Bathroom Policy" TubbyTubby 6 2080 May 17, 2016 at 12:21 pm
Last Post: abaris
  How would you suggest going about dealing with an ignorant extended family member GoHalos1993 21 4863 January 1, 2016 at 7:02 pm
Last Post: SteelCurtain
  Whoopi speaks out against the duggar family dyresand 49 14693 June 10, 2015 at 1:49 pm
Last Post: Pyrrho
  New result on Jesus family ossuaries watchamadoodle 20 5946 April 16, 2015 at 2:27 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Yeah....Way Too Many Fucking Morons Running Around Loose in this Country Minimalist 37 10752 February 3, 2015 at 12:08 am
Last Post: Ravenshire
  Dealing with Religious Family wolfclan96 22 6196 January 16, 2015 at 8:13 pm
Last Post: wolfclan96



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)