(July 28, 2014 at 8:28 am)DeistPaladin Wrote: I am expressing some amazement at the spurious and fallacious logic at work here to assume the story is true. The fact that the same story element crops up in different versions doesn't prove the truth of it.I'm sorry. I've been arguing with you in so many places that I must have forgotten to re-state my caveat…
None of the details I am pointing out are proof that the Gospels are true. They simply happen to be things that you'd expect to see if the story was true, so they indicate the mere possibility that they could be true.