RE: Is Sam Harris becoming a pariah for the anti-religious cause?
July 28, 2014 at 7:07 pm
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2014 at 7:14 pm by Autumnlicious.)
Human shields are illegal for the reason that they use innocents as an armour against others. While committing violence.
Gazan civilians are human shields by Hamas's own hands. Not Israeli hands. Hamas's hands. They corral and force civilians near legitimate military targets.
Mainly to drum up sympathy from idiots like...
Your entire strategy effectively allows free use of human shields without consequence.
What a wonderful world you must live in, where all the men willing to commit murder are nice enough not to involve innocents.
I keep citing the Geneva Conventions. Conventions agreed upon for war time. You know -- when diplomacy has broken down and states are murdering as many from the opposing side.
What can you cite?
This is why you have no respect from me in this discussion.
The Pacific Theater was inordinately bloody.
The invasion for forcing a surrender in mainland Japan (so they could not build up and continue waging war) was projected to have incredibly high numbers of casualties and fatalities.
The nuclear strikes clearly illustrated "Surrender or be destroyed".
It worked. Had it not, there wouldn't be a Japan anymore.
Guess who made the decision that living is better than death? The Japanese.
Yet another reason why you engender no respect. Overly dramatic.
Who is placing those children next to rockets? Hamas.
No rockets near/in schools == no shells hitting schools.
Gazan civilians are human shields by Hamas's own hands. Not Israeli hands. Hamas's hands. They corral and force civilians near legitimate military targets.
Mainly to drum up sympathy from idiots like...
Your entire strategy effectively allows free use of human shields without consequence.
What a wonderful world you must live in, where all the men willing to commit murder are nice enough not to involve innocents.
I keep citing the Geneva Conventions. Conventions agreed upon for war time. You know -- when diplomacy has broken down and states are murdering as many from the opposing side.
What can you cite?
Quote:This is exactly the solution you're advocating. Japan bombs Pearl Harbour, fuck this shit, let's nuke them.
You would of thought the world would have learned by now
This is why you have no respect from me in this discussion.
The Pacific Theater was inordinately bloody.
The invasion for forcing a surrender in mainland Japan (so they could not build up and continue waging war) was projected to have incredibly high numbers of casualties and fatalities.
The nuclear strikes clearly illustrated "Surrender or be destroyed".
It worked. Had it not, there wouldn't be a Japan anymore.
Guess who made the decision that living is better than death? The Japanese.
(July 28, 2014 at 7:00 pm)Napoléon Wrote: Genocide, perhaps not, but they are disproportionately massacring innocent children.
Yet another reason why you engender no respect. Overly dramatic.
Who is placing those children next to rockets? Hamas.
No rockets near/in schools == no shells hitting schools.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
