Did I miss anything?

[Esquilax]

to absolutly everyone who asks, no matter what they have done, no matter who they are on a planetary scale, spanning the whole of human history?

Well, there's a threshold, but at the point at which it has passed one really needs to be asking why god ever would reward such a person. God seems to really lack discernment.

To forgive a heinous sin committed against you their is a great personal cost.

But this is the real problem here, because none of those crimes, no matter how great, affect god in the slightest. Even assuming he forgives everyone ever out of hand... there's no cost to that. Merely asserting one doesn't demonstrate it, especially when you're still just talking in abstracts.

if you ask me I can point to the bible where it tells us there was a great cost to God to forgive the sins of the whole world.

... And fails to mention what that cost is. But why would you point me to the same random, vague assertion in the bible, knowing ahead of time that I don't think the bible is infallible? The fact that your poorly constructed theology is a part of the biblical narrative doesn't make it better.

To the question now returns to you. How do you know what thinks or feels?

I don't believe he exists? But costs can be demonstrated, or at least stated, and at this point I also have no reason to believe any cost actually applies to divine forgiveness, because of the evasiveness of the people trying to explain it. Things need to be demonstrated; I don't care if the bible asserts there's a cost, I want to know what it is.

Not true. They knew disobedience resulted in death.

... From a position where they had no concept of what death was, and no concept of good and evil. You might as well say that they knew disobedience resulted in flornax: without any idea of what that is, it's not exactly a cogently presented consequence, now is it?

With out the tree their could be no choice. We all have always been given a choice whether or not to follow God or go our own way.

Seems a bit passive aggressive, really? Do you put a nuclear bomb in your kid's playpen, because he needs a choice whether or not to touch it?

I really don't think the scenario here is improved by noting that god specifically formulated the most danger ever and placed it in close proximity to his children in order to get them to hurt themselves so he can say "I told you so."

The greater point I was making was we from the beginning we were provided a sinless environment , and it is only in this sinless environment can we commune with God. If we wish to commune with God we owe a sin debt. One that we can not repay, but one Christ paided for us.

Fiat assertion of a debt for something I didn't do doesn't convince me. I'm an individual person, supposedly imbued with free will, why am I being packaged in along with everyone else with this nonsense?

Does 'my' theology still confuse you?

Yes. But then, I am actually thinking about it, so that's no surprise.