RE: A discussion around family table.
May 27, 2010 at 2:07 am
(This post was last modified: May 27, 2010 at 6:40 am by tackattack.)
@Min- They weren't platitudes identified by Christians. In case you missed the point, there are reasonable atheists who try an unbiased approach to the study of theism. They wrote the skeptics annotated guide to the bible from whence I had quoted.
1-The "it's" in "it's not about..." was in regards to the convrsation not the content of the book, hence the " it's about whether they're good or bad rules to follow."
2-To her own admision she has not entirely read the Bible
And on that note I think I'll have to fully agree with Fr0d0 and assume no progress can be made in this thread, hijack away.
(May 26, 2010 at 10:53 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote:
1-The "it's" in "it's not about..." was in regards to the convrsation not the content of the book, hence the " it's about whether they're good or bad rules to follow."
2-To her own admision she has not entirely read the Bible
And on that note I think I'll have to fully agree with Fr0d0 and assume no progress can be made in this thread, hijack away.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari