(August 2, 2014 at 6:09 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:
(August 2, 2014 at 4:45 pm)coldwx Wrote: So Pascal's wager is your answer? Thanks for the fail. Then the shifting of the burden of proof begins. Fail number two.
Read the thread title.
The question was raised by the OP if Christians could be wrong. My answer was if we're wrong then it doesn't matter, now does it? I also stated that I'm not trying to convince, or prove anything to anyone.
If you find that you're happy doing whatever you do in life and are fulfilled, then keep on doing whatever it is you do. The notion that I have to prove something to you is absurd.
(August 2, 2014 at 4:45 pm)coldwx Wrote: So you want us to be sheep? That really isn't the analogy I would go for if I was trying to convince a group of critical thinkers.
Again, I clearly stated that I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. Better to be a sheep than a lemming.
But regardless, you're going to follow something and I find it interesting that this group of "critical thinkers" are unable to form an original thought but choose to parrot Hitchens, Dawkins etc....
Oh and btw, here's a video of your group of "critical thinkers"
I did read the thread title, then I actually read the question that was posed:
"As an atheist I am willing to admit that I could be wrong. God may exist. Your Bible may be 100% accurate. All I need is evidence.
Is there anything that could convince you that the God of the Bible may not exist?"
If you are not trying to prove you are right then why are you here arguing to prove you are right?
And now we have moved on to a strawman, let's just pack them all in.
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. "