RE: Evolution Facts
August 11, 2014 at 11:57 am
(This post was last modified: August 11, 2014 at 12:10 pm by Mister Agenda.)
(July 17, 2014 at 2:51 pm)alpha male Wrote: Strange animals may have their own distinct nervous system.
Confusion reigns at the base of the animal family tree.
If you think this suggests that early animals started out simple and gradually evolved new features, and things like sponges branched off before they were added, you wouldn't be alone. Over the years, lots of researchers argued the same thing. But a recent genome sequence indicated that the oldest branch of the animal family tree that led to the comb jellies, with muscles, nerves, and tentacles, were an older branch than sponges. Now with a new paper on the comb jelly, researchers are starting to argue over what this actually tells us about the earliest animals.
(July 17, 2014 at 2:51 pm)alpha male Wrote: Cue the "But...but...the authors still believe in evolution" responses.
But...but...that quote had nothing in it counter to evolution!
(July 22, 2014 at 10:01 pm)alexwenzel Wrote:(July 16, 2014 at 2:00 am)Esquilax Wrote: Right, so if you know all this then you should have no problem going back to page five, reading my posts there where I respond to you and post sources that show that all of your claims are demonstrably wrong to such a degree that you've mislabelled basic concepts and said things don't exist when we have evidence that they do, and admit that you were wrong.
Or was the reason you stopped being an atheist that you decided honesty wasn't for you?
I refuse. I could be putting other posts and links and then you will put another one and will go on forever. Proof of a intelligent designer is out there, just have to look for and use your common sense. Its called evolution theory for a reason. Its only a theory and what they claim to be proof are full of holes and lies.
Just to state this clearly: colloquially, the word 'theory' is roughly equivalent to the term 'educated guess'. In science, a theory is a well-confirmed explanation of something in nature constructed using the scientific method, that any scientist in the field can understand and provide evidence to support it or falsify it. Scientific theories are the most comprehensive form of scientific knowledge.
If the word 'theory' being used in biology is a problem for you, why don't you take on cell theory or germ theory? The obvious answer is that you don't have a religious objection to them being true.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.