Personally I think that bringing up historical facts which do not support the bible, comparative religion which gives them a wider view of religions in general and make them think about subjective interpretation will go longer way in disproving the bible to Christians. The best way to widen the narrow minded experience that Christians who believe in the literal bible is to undermine the book's foundations.
You have to remember that if they believe in a book such as that, it's because objective logic does not apply. It's something else that "feeds" their belief in the bible being the literal word of god. They have "faith".
You have to remember that if they believe in a book such as that, it's because objective logic does not apply. It's something else that "feeds" their belief in the bible being the literal word of god. They have "faith".
