Hey Anti-Theists! Prove Your Claim

[Mudhammam]

Anti-theism has the following burden of proof to meet:

1) To demonstrate that superstitious beliefs are, all things considered, harmful to human progress and modern society.
2) Refute any purported inherent connection between superstition and the good done in the name thereof.

Anti-theism is not required to dispel any particular notion of God.

Like it's been said earlier, that depends on the definition of anti-theism that you're using. If the definition is 'the positive claim of the non-existence of a theistic proposition' (e.g. God doesn't exist) then there's a burden of proof other than those you've stated.

Yes, dogmatical atheism is as much of a claim as dogmatical theism. But one can be little more than skeptical and still vehemently oppose any sacrifice demanded of humans in the empirical world for the sake of one that can only be imagined.