RE: On naturalism and consciousness
August 17, 2014 at 11:19 am
(This post was last modified: August 17, 2014 at 11:23 am by The Grand Nudger.)
Meh, particles can clearly be "about something" or else computing would be impossible. Machine language and computational architecture depends upon particles having the ability to be "about something". Having something like programs, or services, or users (I would consider consciousness a service or user or program) enhances that capability, but even without any of those things a PCB is capable of "doing work" - of describing and then handling propositions. All you need to "do work" is an ALU and some inputs. It doesn't matter where those inputs come from, and it doesn't matter what the ALU is made out of, or how it's arranged. As such, it;s not conceptually impossible, or even conceptually difficult...for particles to be "beliefs".
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!