RE: Proving the Bible is false in few words.
June 4, 2010 at 8:36 pm
(This post was last modified: June 4, 2010 at 8:37 pm by fr0d0.)
Puh! 
NIV : "In short, perhaps no other translation has been made by a more thorough process of review and revision." - http://www.biblegateway.com/versions/New...ble/#vinfo
" the NIV is based on different manuscripts, which modern scholars generally (though not unanimously) believe better reflect the texts as originally written."
KJV & NKJV : "One major criticism involves the fact that it is based solely upon the ancient texts available during the time of King James and not on earlier manuscripts and documents which have since been discovered
the NKJV's adherence to the Textus Receptus seems to many to violate the spirit of open scholarship and open inquiry, and to ascribe a level of perfection to the documents available to the 17th century scholars that they would not have claimed for themselves"
NASB : "The greatest perceived strength of the NASB is its reliability and fidelity to the original languages, which, along with other literal translations, also allows for ambiguities in the text's meaning. Its corresponding weakness is that its readability and literary style sometimes prove confusing to the average reader. "
Similarly this applies to Young's Translation.
(other quotes from wikipedia - coz we all know it's RIGHT!!!
)
NIV : "In short, perhaps no other translation has been made by a more thorough process of review and revision." - http://www.biblegateway.com/versions/New...ble/#vinfo
" the NIV is based on different manuscripts, which modern scholars generally (though not unanimously) believe better reflect the texts as originally written."
KJV & NKJV : "One major criticism involves the fact that it is based solely upon the ancient texts available during the time of King James and not on earlier manuscripts and documents which have since been discovered
the NKJV's adherence to the Textus Receptus seems to many to violate the spirit of open scholarship and open inquiry, and to ascribe a level of perfection to the documents available to the 17th century scholars that they would not have claimed for themselves"
NASB : "The greatest perceived strength of the NASB is its reliability and fidelity to the original languages, which, along with other literal translations, also allows for ambiguities in the text's meaning. Its corresponding weakness is that its readability and literary style sometimes prove confusing to the average reader. "
Similarly this applies to Young's Translation.
(other quotes from wikipedia - coz we all know it's RIGHT!!!
)
