(August 21, 2014 at 8:31 pm)Blackout Wrote: There is no use in complicating what doesn't have to be complicated. What I'm saying here is that I assume something doesn't exist if there is no evidence, treating the god hypothesis differently just because it's 'god' is in my opinion wrong and fallacious. By claiming knowledge, I recognize my assumption could be wrong, but until now I don't have reasons to think so.
I don't disagree, I'm merely saying (or attempting to, however poorly) that certain conditions of reality do naturally lead us to something like a supreme being, though I'd never bet any amount of money that THAT is in fact a helpful description for whatever is 'out there,' in 'ultimate reality.'
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
